URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION

Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. et al.
Claim Number: FA1910001866754

DOMAIN NAME

<philips.moscow>

PARTIES

	Complainant: Koninklijke Philips N.V. of Einhoven, Netherlands
	Complainant Representative: Ihlas Yazberdiev of Moscow, Russia

	Respondent: Kononenko Anatolii of Samara, II, RU

REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS

	Registries: Foundation for Assistance for Internet Technologies and Infrastructure Development (FAITID)
	Registrars:

EXAMINER

	The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding.
	Richard W. Hill, as Examiner

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

	Complainant Submitted: October 16, 2019
	Commencement: October 17, 2019
	Default Date: November 1, 2019
	Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules").

RELIEF SOUGHT

Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

Clear and convincing evidence.

FINDINGS and DISCUSSION

Findings of Fact: The resolving website purports to offer for sale Complainant's products.

Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.

[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar to a word mark:
  (i) for which the Complainant holds a valid national or regional registration and that is in current use; or
  (ii) that has been validated through court proceedings; or
  (iii) that is specifically protected by a statute or treaty in effect at the time the URS complaint is filed.

Determined: Finding for Complainant

The disputed domain name is identical to Complainant's registered PHILIPS mark.

[URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name.

Determined: Finding for Complainant

Complainant has not licensed or otherwise authorized Respondent to use its mark nor to sell its products. According to the WHOIS, Respondent is "Anatolii Kononenko" and thus not commonly known by the disputed domain name. The resolving website purports to offer for sale Complainant's products. This is not a legitimate use of the disputed domain name.

[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
  a. Registrant has registered or acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or to a competitor of that complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of documented out-of pocket costs directly related to the domain name; or
  b. Registrant has registered the domain name in order to prevent the trademark holder or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, provided that Registrant has engaged in a pattern of such conduct; or
  c. Registrant registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor; or
  d. By using the domain name Registrant has intentionally attempted to attract for commercial gain, Internet users to Registrant's web site or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of Registrant's web site or location or of a product or service on that web site or location.

Determined: Finding for Complainant

As already noted, the resolving website purports to offer for sale Complainant's products, without having been authorized to do so. This disrupts Complainant's business and creates a likelihood of confusion per URS 1.2.6.3(d).

FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD

The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods.

The Examiner finds as follows:

The Complaint was neither abusive nor contained material falsehoods.

DETERMINATION

After reviewing the parties submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for the duration of the registration:

philips.moscow

Richard W. Hill
Examiner
Dated: November 1, 2019

Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.

Click Here to return to our Home Page