SelectCare of
Claim Number: FA0906001268298
PARTIES
Complainant is SelectCare of
REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME
The domain name at issue is <texanplus.com>, registered with Tucows Inc.
PANEL
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and
impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in
serving as Panelist in this proceeding.
Hon. Sir Ian Barker as Panelist.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum
electronically on
On
On June 25, 2009, a Notification
of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative Proceeding (the “Commencement
Notification”), setting a deadline of July 15, 2009 by which Respondent could
file a Response to the Complaint, was transmitted to Respondent via e-mail,
post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent’s registration
as technical, administrative and billing contacts, and to postmaster@texanplus.com by e-mail.
Respondent's Response was received
in electronic copy only on
On
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from
Respondent to Complainant.
PARTIES’ CONTENTIONS
A. Complainant
The Complainant provides insurance underwriting services of prepaid
healthcare insurance for Medicare enrollees and healthcare for provider-sponsored
organizations, health maintenance organizations and preferred provider
organizations for Medicare enrollees.
Its activities cover the entire
The Complainant owns United States Federal trademarks for the mark
TEXANPLUS. The first mark was registered
in
The Complainant uses the mark TEXANPLUS in relation to its services and
has done so since November 2001. It has
acquired significant goodwill and public recognition in the area in which its
goods and services are known to the public.
The domain name is identical to the Complainant’s marks.
The Complainant has not given any rights to the Respondent to use its
name in any way. The Respondent operates
a website under the disputed domain name which advertises various medicare and
healthcare providers, none of which lead to the
Complainant’s own website. The
Complainant does not qualify for any of the exemptions provided in Paragraph 4(c)
of the Policy.
The Respondent must have been aware of the Complainant’s mark when it
registered the disputed domain name on
The use by the Respondent of the
Complainant’s name to attract website users to its site, leading them to the
advertisements for competitors of the Complainant. The
Respondent’s website dilutes the Complainant’s mark and creates an unwanted
association with services which are not offered in a manner commensurate with that
of the Complainant.
B. Respondent
As indicated earlier, the Respondent did not file a proper Response but
indicated that it would release the domain name in question. This, however, is not a
consent to the transfer and, accordingly, the Panel thinks it
appropriate briefly to consider the Complainant’s submissions
FINDINGS
A.
The
disputed domain name is identical to trademarks in which the Complainant has
rights.
B.
The
Respondent has no legitimate rights or interests in respect to the disputed
domain name.
C.
The
disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
DISCUSSION
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules for Uniform Domain
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”) instructs this Panel to “decide a
complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance
with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems
applicable.”
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires that the Complainant must prove
each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name
should be cancelled or transferred:
(1)
the
domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to
a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
(2)
the
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name;
and
(3)
the domain name
has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
The disputed domain name is identical to the
Complainant’s trademarks.
The Complainant gave the Respondent no rights
to use a domain name which is identical to its trademark.
Once that has been established, the onus
shifts to the Respondent to show that it comes within one or other of the limbs
of Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy. The
Respondent has not done so and has indicated its willingness to release the
disputed domain name.
Bad faith registration and use can readily be
inferred by the Panel because of the reputation of the Complainant in offering
medical insurance services throughout the
In these circumstances, the Panel has no
difficulty in finding that the Complainant has proved all three limbs of
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. The finding
is strengthened by the lack of defence from the Respondent and the Respondent’s
willingness to release the domain in question.
DECISION
Having established all three elements required under the ICANN Policy,
the Panel concludes that relief shall be GRANTED.
Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <texanplus.com> domain name be TRANSFERRED
from Respondent to Complainant.
Hon. Sir Ian Barker, Panelist
Dated: August 5, 2009
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page
National Arbitration Forum