Daimler AG v. Thomas Keeley
Claim Number: FA1005001323956
PARTIES
Complainant is Daimler AG (“Complainant”), represented by Jan
Zecher, of Fish & Richardson P.C,
REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME
The domain name at issue is <mecredes.com>, registered with GoDaddy.com,
Inc.
PANEL
The undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and
impartially and to the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in serving
as Panelist in this proceeding.
Richard DiSalle as Panelist.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum
electronically on May 11, 2010.
On May 12, 2010, GoDaddy.com, Inc. confirmed by e-mail to the
National Arbitration Forum that the <mecredes.com> domain name is
registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc. and
that the Respondent is the current registrant of the name. GoDaddy.com,
Inc. has verified that Respondent is bound by the GoDaddy.com, Inc. registration agreement and
has thereby agreed to resolve domain-name disputes brought by third parties in
accordance with ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the
“Policy”).
On May 13, 2010, the Forum served
the Complaint and all Annexes, including a Written Notice of the Complaint,
setting a deadline of June 2, 2010 by which Respondent could file a Response to
the Complaint, via e-mail to all entities and persons listed on Respondent’s
registration as technical, administrative, and billing contacts, and to
postmaster@mecredes.com. Also on May
13, 2010, the Written Notice of the Complaint, notifying Respondent of
the email addresses served and the deadline for a Response,
was transmitted to Respondent via post and fax, to all entities and persons
listed on Respondent’s registration as technical, administrative and billing
contacts.
A timely Response was received and determined to be complete on May 25, 2010.
On May 28, 2010, pursuant to Complainant’s
request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, the National
Arbitration Forum appointed Richard DiSalle as Panelist.
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from
Respondent to Complainant. In his Response,
Respondent also requests that the Panel transfer the domain name to
Complainant.
DECISION
Under the circumstances, since Respondent has agreed that the Panel
should comply with Complainant’s request, the Panel decides it to be expedient
and judicious to forego the traditional UDRP analysis and concludes that the
relief requested should be granted.
Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <mecredes.com> domain name be TRANSFERRED
from Respondent to Complainant.
Dated: June 8, 2010