|
A federal court in Texas lacked jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a mediated settlement agreement after it dismissed the case because the dismissal order did not incorporate the terms of the settlement agreement.
In Academy Homes of Tyler, Ltd. v. Lakeside Park Homes, Inc., No. 6:06-CV-159, 2007 WL 1428662 (E.D. Tex. May 11, 2007), Academy Homes (Academy) sued Lakeside for fraud and breach of contract. The dispute was settled through mediation, and the Court subsequently dismissed the case with prejudice.
Later, Academy filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement, claiming that Lakeside failed to perform its obligations under the agreement.
While expressing sympathy for Academy and disappointment in Lakeside, the Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. Jurisdiction could be found "only if the parties' obligation to comply with the terms of the settlement agreement has been made part of the order of dismissal."
The Court's order for dismissal did not incorporate the terms of the settlement agreement, such that Lakeside's refusal to abide by the settlement agreement did not violate the Court's order. Accordingly, the Court had no jurisdiction to enforce the agreement.
Subscribe to a free weekly update on ADR case law and
legislation
|