NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
Schneider Electric SA v. harvey zhu et al.
Claim Number: FA1502001605194
DOMAIN NAME
<schneider-electric.wang>
PARTIES
Complainant: Schneider Electric SA of RUEIL-MALMAISON, France | |
Complainant Representative: Nameshield
Laurent Becker of Angers, France
|
Respondent: harvey zhu zhu harvey of Fo Shan Shi, Guang Dong, II, CN | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: Zodiac Leo Limited | |
Registrars: Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Mr. Sebastian Matthew White Hughes, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: February 17, 2015 | |
Commencement: February 18, 2015 | |
Default Date: March 13, 2015 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the National Arbitration Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: [OptionalComment] |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant is the owner of an international trademark registration for the trademark SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC covering no less than 73 jurisdictions and registered since March 15, 1999 (the "Trademark"). The registered domain name is identical to the Trademark. It comprises the Trademark in its entirety together with the gTLD .wang (the pinyin version in Romanized text of the Chinese character meaning "Internet"). [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant There is no evidence that Respondent has any legitimate rights or interests in the domain name. Respondent has made no use of the domain name.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant The domain name is identical to the Trademark. The Trademark has been registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse since November 26, 2013. Respondent must therefore have been aware of the Trademark and of Complainant's rights in the Trademark when it registered the domain name. Respondent has made no use of the domain name. In all the circumstances, the Examiner has no hesitation in determining the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Mr. Sebastian Matthew White Hughes Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page