URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
LVMH SWISS MANUFACTURES SA v. Customz et al.
Claim Number: FA1505001619117
DOMAIN NAME
<tagheuer.international>
PARTIES
Complainant: LVMH SWISS MANUFACTURES SA Marie Wormser of LA-CHAUX-DE-FONDS, Switzerland | |
Complainant Representative: DOMAINOO
Virginie Poindron of Paris, France
|
Respondent: Customz Steven McDaniel of Brookfield, WI, US | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: Wild Way, LLC | |
Registrars: Godaddy LLC |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Sandra J. Franklin, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: May 13, 2015 | |
Commencement: May 13, 2015 | |
Default Date: May 28, 2015 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: [OptionalComment] |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant prevails under urs 1.2.6.1.(i) [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant Respondent is not using the disputed domain name for a bona fide offering of goods or services, or a noncommercial or fair use.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant prevails under URS 1.2.6.3.a. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Sandra J. Franklin Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page