
        NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
        
        usRS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
    
        Moncler S.P.A. v. newbeta
        Claim Number: FA1701001713273
    
DOMAIN NAME
        <monclervipstore.us>
 <moncleroutwear.us>
PARTIES
| Complainant: Moncler S.P.A. of Milano, Italy | |
| 
                    Complainant Representative: The GigaLaw Firm, Douglas M Isenberg, Attorney at Law, LLC 
Douglas M Isenberg of Atlanta, GA, United States of America 
                 | 
| Respondent: newbeta Trani Johanna of Shanghai, II, United Kingdom | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
| Registries: NeuStar | |
| Registrars: GODADDY.COM, INC. | 
EXAMINER
| The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
| Sandra J. Franklin, as Examiner | 
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
| Complainant Submitted: January 19, 2017 | |
| Commencement: January 20, 2017 | |
| Default Date: February 6, 2017 | |
| Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the National Arbitration Forum has discharged its responsibility under usRS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the .usTLD Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). | 
RELIEF SOUGHT
| Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. | 
STANDARD OF REVIEW
| Clear and convincing evidence. | 
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
| Findings of Fact: [OptionalComment] | 
| Even though the Respondent has defaulted, usRS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended. 
                    [usRS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
                    to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant prevails under URS1.2.6.1.(i). [usRS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant Respondent is using the disputed domain names to sell counterfeit goods. 
                    [usRS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
                     Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant prevails under URS 1.2.6.3.c. and d. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows: 
 
                    DETERMINATION 
                        After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
                        has demonstrated all three elements of the usRS by a standard of clear and convincing
                        evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
                        the duration of the registration:
                         
 | 
| 
 | ||
| Sandra J. Franklin, Examiner Dated: February 6, 2017 | 
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page