URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
JCDecaux SA v. Pan Jing
Claim Number: FA1704001726723
DOMAIN NAME
<jcdecaux.online>
PARTIES
Complainant: JCDecaux SA of PLAISIR, France | |
Complainant Representative: Nameshield
Laurent Becker of Angers, France
|
Respondent: Pan Jing Pan Jing of Bei Jing, Bei Jing, II, CN | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: DotOnline Inc. | |
Registrars: EJEE Group Holdings Limited |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Ho-Hyun Nahm, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: April 13, 2017 | |
Commencement: April 13, 2017 | |
Default Date: April 28, 2017 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: [OptionalComment] |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant A. The domain name(s) is/are identical to Complainant’s trademark(s) The domain name is identical to the Complainant’s international trademark “JCDECAUX” no. 803987 registered on November 27th, 2001. The oldest trademark being registered in France on May 17th, 1984. The addition of the new gTLD ".ONLINE" is not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain name is identical to the Complainant's trademark “JCDECAUX” and therefore doesn’t eliminate the likelihood of confusion with its trademark. [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant B. Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name The Respondent has no rights or interests in respect of the domain name and is not related to the Complainant’s business. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the respondent. According to the Whois of the disputed domain name, the Respondent is "Pan Jing". Past panels have held that a Respondent was not commonly known by a domain name if the Whois information was not similar to the domain name. Thus, the Respondent is not known as "JCDECAUX". Please see for instance: NAF - FA699652 - Braun Corp. v. Loney Furthermore, the domain name does not resolve to an active website. The Respondent has made no use of the domain name to date and he has not provided any evidence to support that he intends to make a legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the domain name.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant C. The domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith The domain name is identical to the Complainant’s trademarks “JCDECAUX” registered on November 27th, 2001. The Complainant has a strong reputation and a high-profile presence in advertising and media sectors all around the world, with more than 49,300 screens across 30 countries in Airports, Rail and Metro Stations, Shopping Malls, on Billboards and Street Furniture. The domain name displays an inactive webpage, and the domain name is offered for sale on the SEDO’s platform at the price of USD 2000$. It demonstrates that the registration of this domain name was made for the sole purpose to sell it. Respondent has registered or acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or to a competitor of that complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of documented out-of pocket costs directly related to the domain name. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Ho-Hyun Nahm Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page