URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
Bloomberg Finance L.P. v. 李文思 et al.
Claim Number: FA1705001734041
DOMAIN NAME
<bloomberg.vip>
PARTIES
Complainant: Bloomberg Finance L.P. Amin Kassam of New York, NY, United States of America | |
Respondent: 李文思 李文思 李文思 of 北京市, II, CN | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: Minds + Machines Group Limited | |
Registrars: Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina (www.net.cn) |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Honorable Charles K. McCotter Jr., (Ret.), as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: May 31, 2017 | |
Commencement: June 1, 2017 | |
Default Date: June 16, 2017 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: [OptionalComment] |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant’s Marks are strong and have gained secondary meaning through their continuous use in connection with Complainant’s electronic trading, financial news, and information businesses. The <bloomberg.vip> domain name is confusingly similar to the BLOOMBERG mark. [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant Complainant has not authorized Respondent to use Complainant’s BLOOMBERG mark. There is no evidence to suggest that the Respondent listed on the WHOIS record is commonly known by the name “Bloomberg.” Respondent uses the domain name to point to a non-functioning website.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant Respondent was aware of Complainant’s Marks before registering the domain name. Respondent's domain name resolves to an inactive website. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Honorable Charles K. McCotter Jr., (Ret.) Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page