URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
JCDECAUX SA v. 宋光宇
Claim Number: FA1712001762776
DOMAIN NAME
<jcdecaux.vip>
PARTIES
Complainant: JCDECAUX SA of PLAISIR, France | |
Complainant Representative: Nameshield
Laurent Becker of Angers, France
|
Respondent: 宋光宇 宋光宇 宋光宇 of 市辖区, 北京市, II, CN | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: Minds + Machines Group Limited | |
Registrars: Chengdu west dimension digital |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Alan L. Limbury, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: December 14, 2017 | |
Commencement: December 14, 2017 | |
Default Date: January 2, 2018 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: [OptionalComment] |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant Since the gTLD "vip" is inconsequential in relation to this element, the domain name is identical to the Complainant's internationally registered JCDECAUX trademark No. 803987, registered on November 27, 2001 and currently in use. [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant The Complainant's assertions that the Respondent is not related to the Complainant’s business; that the Complainant has no business with the Respondent; that the Respondent is not commonly known by the domain name; that the Respondent has made no use of the domain name to date except in order to sell it; and has not provided any evidence of an intention to make a legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the domain name suffice to establish a prima facie case of lack of rights or legitimate interests in the domain name on the part of the Respondent. In the absence of any Response, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established this element.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant The domain name was registered on May 27, 2016. It resolves to a webpage at which it is offered for sale. In light of the significant international reputation of the Complainant's mark, the domain name must have been registered with that mark in mind. In the absence of any Response, the Panel concludes that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Alan L. Limbury Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page