<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="css/rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>National Arbitration Forum Today In ADR</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/</link>
<description></description>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 National Arbitration Forum</copyright> 
<pubDate>11/20/2009</pubDate>
<item>
<title>South Carolina Supreme Court Invalidates Agreement, Refuses to Appoint Alternate Arbitrator Upon Administrator?s Refusal to Hear Healthcare Dispute </title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2160</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>7/7/2009 9:08:28 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Non-Mutual Arbitration Obligation Invalidates Arbitration Agreement Incident to Consumer Loan Contract</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2159</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/26/2009 12:16:58 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Georgia Law Prohibiting Enforcement of Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements in Medical Malpractice Context Preempted by FAA </title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2156</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/26/2009 12:02:31 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wrongful Death Claims Derivative and Arbitrable Under Texas and Federal Law, Says Fifth Circuit</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2135</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/22/2009 11:13:03 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Federal District Court Adopts Minority View that CROA Claims Must Be Litigated</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2106</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/12/2009 10:45:01 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fifth Circuit Adopts Rule Recognizing Plaintiff?s Greater Tendency to Waive Right to Arbitrate By Filing Suit </title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2105</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/12/2009 10:31:50 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Agreement in CBA Expressly Encompassing Statutory Employment Discrimination Claims Binds Individuals to Arbitrate</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2094</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/22/2009 4:12:18 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Second Circuit Finds Federal Jurisdiction to Uphold Consumer?s Right to Arbitration, Prohibits State Court from Enjoining Arbitral Proceedings </title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2093</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/14/2009 9:20:38 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fifth Circuit: Extrastatutory &quot;Manifest Disregard&quot; Vacatur Dead After Hall Street</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2076</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/20/2009 4:12:23 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Validation of an Arbitration Agreement Is Not a Pre-Condition to Bringing a Motion to Confirm</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=2056</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/20/2009 3:46:36 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court in New Jersey Rules That FAA Preempts Rule Against Class Waivers in Arbitration Agreements</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1920</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/29/2008 10:02:55 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Eighth Circuit Upholds Class Waiver Where Arbitration Agreement and Statutory Fee-Shifting Provision Would Allow Claimant to Recover Her Attorney Fees</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1844</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/1/2009 11:01:00 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Law Allows Parties to Contract for Heightened Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1792</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/1/2009 11:01:00 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Upholds Class Waiver in Wireless Service Agreement Because Customer Had &quot;Meaningful Opportunity&quot; to Reject the Agreement
</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1778</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/25/2008 10:06:23 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Texas Court of Appeals: Parties Cannot Obtain Heightened Judicial Review by Arguing That Arbitrator Exceeded Their Powers</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1756</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/12/2008 11:47:34 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Did Not Exceed Powers by Applying Equitable Principles and Excusing Noncompliance with Notice-and-Cure Provision</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1729</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/1/2009 11:01:00 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Rules Provided Legal Basis for Attorney Fees Award By Authorizing Arbitrator to Grant Any &quot;Just and Equitable&quot; Relief</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1695</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>7/7/2008 9:25:55 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Party Who Received Notice of Arbitration But Did Not Object Can Not Raise Post-Award Challenge to Existence of Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1671</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/18/2008 10:12:17 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Colorado Law Permits Attorney-in-Fact to Agree to Arbitration on Behalf of Nursing Home Resident
</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1655</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/11/2008 3:41:38 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sexual Assault Claim Falls Outside the Scope of Employee&#39;s Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1654</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/9/2008 4:51:47 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Louisiana Court Holds That FAA Deadline for Challenging Award Does Not Preclude Party from Arguing No Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1639</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/3/2008 4:45:47 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FAA Preempts Texas Law Imposing Special Conditions on Agreements to Arbitrate Personal Injury Claims</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1615</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/29/2008 2:22:19 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FAA Does Not Apply to Mediation Agreements</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1614</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/27/2008 11:08:01 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FORUM Code of Procedure Authorizes Arbitrators to Sanction Parties Who Bring Frivolous Claims</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1613</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/16/2008 3:15:13 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court Honors Choice-of-Law Provision and Upholds Class Waiver Under Virginia Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1612</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/13/2008 4:32:26 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Third Circuit Finds No Procedural Unconscionability Where Employee Agreeing to Arbitrate Was Highly Educated</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1611</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/9/2008 11:03:36 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Court Finds That Parties Cannot Contract for Heightened Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1601</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/6/2008 3:34:39 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sixth Circuit Holds That Non-Signatories Have No Right to Interlocutory Appeal of Order Denying Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1586</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/1/2009 11:01:00 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arkansas Federal Court Finds That FAA Preempts Mutuality Requirement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1584</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/17/2008 10:51:01 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Under Missouri Law, Wrongful Death Claims Now Arbitrable Under Decedent&#39;s Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1570</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/8/2008 1:17:06 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reference to Arbitration Rules Proves Parties? Intent to Submit Arbitrability Questions to Arbitrator</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1555</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/3/2008 12:00:19 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Exceeded His Powers by Disregarding Parties&#39; Instructions to Apply Wisconsin Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1554</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/1/2009 11:01:00 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Supreme Court Holds That FAA Grounds for Vacatur Are Exclusive</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1544</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/1/2009 11:01:00 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Arbitration Act Preempts Oklahoma Law Disallowing Arbitration Agreements in Nursing Home Contracts</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1516</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/13/2008 11:21:03 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Seventh Circuit Upholds Arbitrator&#39;s Award of Equitable Relief</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1515</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/6/2008 5:04:14 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Supreme Court Grants Cert to Answer Lingering Question on Permissible Scope of Union-Negotiated Arbitration Agreements</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1501</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/4/2008 11:17:40 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Termination of Employee for Refusing to Execute an Arbitration Agreement Covering Pending Claims Held &quot;Retaliatory&quot; by Eleventh Circuit</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1481</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/25/2008 4:31:52 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>North Carolina Supreme Court Finds Arbitration Cost-Prohibitive Where Agreement Required Losing Party to Pay for Arbitral Appeal</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1463</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/1/2009 11:01:00 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Agreements &quot;Part of the Bargain&quot; If Conspicuous or Brought to Attention Elsewhere in the Contract</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1453</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/11/2008 11:15:40 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Under Mississippi Law, Health Care Surrogates Have Statutory Authority to Agree to Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1430</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/5/2008 4:31:32 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Law Firm Did Not Waive Right to Arbitrate by Filing Collection Lawsuit</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1429</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/1/2008 3:41:07 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ninth Circuit Finds Class Waiver Unenforceable Under Washington Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1418</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/30/2008 11:15:17 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pennsylvania Supreme Court Finds No Federal Preemption of State&#39;s Thirty Day Limit on Challenging Arbitration Awards</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1417</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/28/2008 3:16:53 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Party Waived Challenge to Validity of Arbitration Agreement by Not Appearing in Court or Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1393</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/23/2008 12:47:11 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agreement to Arbitrate Must Be Mandatory To Be &quot;Health Care Decision&quot; Under Mississippi Statute</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1392</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/21/2008 2:24:04 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Rules Preserve Arbitration Agreement by Allowing Claimant to Avoid Unaffordable Costs</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1368</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/4/2008 2:24:46 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrators&#39; Lack of Information Does Not Constitute &quot;Mistake&quot; That Would Warrant Award Modification</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1365</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/20/2007 8:42:12 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Awareness of Underlying Contract Along with Access to Its Terms Sufficient to Prove Existence of Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1345</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/13/2007 2:28:36 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Notice Deficiencies Render Class Waiver Unenforceable Under Massachusetts Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1344</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/10/2007 5:00:08 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Prohibition on Written Opinions Renders Employee&#39;s Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1328</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/6/2007 4:46:33 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Party Fails to Preserve Issue of Arbitrability by Not Objecting to Arbitration Proceeding</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1327</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/29/2007 8:49:22 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court Grants Comity to Tribal Court?s Vacatur of Arbitration Award</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1326</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/27/2007 10:17:51 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Three-Month Deadline for Challenging Award Started to Run When Award Was Placed in the Mail</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1316</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/20/2007 11:40:39 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Power of Attorney for Health Care Decisions Authorized Attorney-in-Fact to Enter Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1305</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/15/2007 11:25:52 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Upholding Class Waiver Under Texas Law Did Not Violate Public Policy of Washington</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1304</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/9/2007 7:04:53 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Award Confirmation Does Not Require Signed Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1251</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/17/2007 9:51:08 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ninth Circuit Finds Class Waiver Unenforceable Under California Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1218</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/3/2007 9:10:36 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dispute Arising from ?Deep Throat? Revelation Must Be Arbitrated</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1206</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/27/2007 9:33:45 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nonsignatory Fails in Attempt to Compel Arbitration of Dispute Arising from Separate Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1168</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/31/2007 12:38:54 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Inventorship Disputes Can Be Resolved Through Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1157</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/29/2007 8:29:39 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Good Faith Appeal from Order Denying Arbitration Precludes Further Discovery</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1129</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/9/2007 12:20:14 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Party Waived Right to Arbitrate By Misleading Court on Terms of Proposed Settlement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1115</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/8/2007 9:49:37 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Mexico Court Honors Texas Choice-of-Law Provision in Upholding Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1114</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/7/2007 9:32:39 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Must Decide Whether Party Complied with Conditions Precedent to Arbitration
</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1103</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/2/2007 8:45:55 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Oregon Court Relies on AAA?s Class Arbitration Policy in Holding That Arbitration Agreement Permits Class-Wide Proceedings</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1102</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>7/31/2007 9:08:35 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Second Circuit Finds ?Evident Partiality? Where Arbitrator Attempted to Preserve Neutrality by Not Investigating a Potential Conflict</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1089</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>7/26/2007 9:45:56 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Proper Mailing of Arbitration Agreement Creates Presumption of Receipt</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1067</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>7/10/2007 7:30:53 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court Honors Choice-of-Law Provision and Upholds Class Action Waiver Under Texas Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1066</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>7/9/2007 7:47:12 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Exceeded His Powers by Disregarding Contractual Mandate to Award Attorney Fees to the Prevailing Party</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1037</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/28/2007 8:01:50 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Doctrine of &quot;Complete Preemption&quot; Creates Federal Jurisdiction over Petition to Compel Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1036</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/26/2007 8:47:34 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator, Not Court, Must Decide Whether Arbitration Proceedings Should Be Consolidated</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1035</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/25/2007 10:47:09 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Jersey Arbitration Act Expressly Permits Parties to Contract for Heightened Judicial Review</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1034</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/22/2007 10:09:09 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Operator of Virtual World &quot;Second Life&quot; Must Resolve Real World Dispute in Court</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1016</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/20/2007 7:46:16 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Law Does Not Allow Parties to Challenge Arbitration Awards Beyond the Statutory Deadline</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1015</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/18/2007 7:35:15 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Colorado Supreme Court Rejects &quot;Intertwining Doctrine&quot; As Basis for Denying Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=1014</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/15/2007 8:01:17 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Jersey Federal Court Applies Utah Law in Upholding Bar on Class-Wide Proceedings</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=999</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/12/2007 8:00:26 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Disclosure of Early Neutral Evaluation Violated Court&#39;s ADR Rules</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=998</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/8/2007 10:53:44 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fifth Circuit Upholds Arbitration Agreement in Employment Dispute</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=982</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/7/2007 8:25:04 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alabama Supreme Court Finds &quot;Clear and Unmistakable&quot; Evidence of Intent to Arbitrate Questions of Arbitrability</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=981</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/6/2007 7:51:48 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrators Exceeded Their Authority by Ignoring Clear Language of Contract</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=979</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>6/1/2007 8:27:04 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Class Action Waiver Upheld Under D.C. Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=969</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/30/2007 9:57:25 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ninth Circuit Implicitly Adopts Rebuttable Presumption of Procedural Unconscionability, but Only for Employee Contracts</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=950</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/18/2007 7:33:13 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ohio Supreme Court Preserves Arbitration Agreement by Severing Provision for Heightened Review</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=940</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/16/2007 7:15:40 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Presumption in Favor of Arbitration Does Not Extend to Jury Trial Waivers</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=939</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/11/2007 8:35:55 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Can Delve into Merits of Arbitrable Dispute When Party Seeking Arbitration Requests Ruling on the Merits</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=935</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/3/2007 7:31:39 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Eleventh Circuit: Federal Courts Have Jurisdiction Over a Petition to Compel Arbitration If Underlying Dispute Presents Federal Question</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=934</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/2/2007 7:54:42 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Refuses to Enforce Arbitration Agreement Because AHLA Arbitration Rules Elevated the Claimant&#39;s Evidentiary Burden</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=920</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>5/1/2007 7:27:11 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Claim of Duress Raised a Question for the Arbitrator, Not the Court, Because Alleged Duress Related to the Contract As a Whole</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=919</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/27/2007 7:05:17 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Connecticut Supreme Court Upholds AAA Arbitration Award Despite Vacancy on Arbitration Panel</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=904</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/26/2007 7:30:13 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court Follows Majority Rule and Stays Further Proceedings Pending Appeal from Order Denying Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=894</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/19/2007 6:47:37 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lack of Mutuality Does Not Necessarily Invalidate an Arbitration Agreement Under Oregon Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=877</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/16/2007 7:15:40 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court Upholds Class Action Waiver Under Arkansas Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=855</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/11/2007 7:21:24 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lack of Mutuality and Limitation on Damages Render Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable Under South Carolina Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=854</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/10/2007 7:09:27 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Court Honors Delaware Choice-of-Law Provision in Upholding Agreement to Arbitrate</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=853</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/9/2007 10:25:42 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fourth Circuit: Validity of Class Action Waiver Is a Procedural Question for the Arbitrator, Not a Gateway Issue for the Court</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=852</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/6/2007 8:46:02 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Agreement Governs Underlying Contract Rejected by Bankruptcy Debtor</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=838</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>4/5/2007 7:56:41 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kentucky Savings Statute Tolls Deadline for Challenging Arbitration Award</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=835</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/30/2007 2:01:32 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Frivolous Challenge to Arbitration Award Triggers Sanctions</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=826</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/27/2007 7:19:26 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Maryland Court &quot;Stands Firm in the Majority&quot; of Courts Upholding Class Action Waivers</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=825</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/26/2007 10:32:53 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Rejects Unconscionability Challenge to Arbitrator?s Determination That Class-Wide Proceedings Were Unavailable</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=824</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/23/2007 7:00:38 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Court Finds That Husband Did Not Have Statutory Authority to Enter Arbitration Agreement on Wife&#39;s Behalf</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=813</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/22/2007 9:45:20 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Second Circuit Precedent Allows Courts to Grant Provisional Remedies When International Arbitration Is Pending</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=812</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/21/2007 9:12:48 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Finds That Arbitration Can Advance Policy Embodied by Antihazing Statute</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=811</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/20/2007 10:45:37 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Employee Cannot Intervene in EEOC Enforcement Lawsuit If Discrimination Claims Are Subject to Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=810</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/16/2007 8:33:49 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ADR Provision Remains in Force After Termination of Underlying Contract</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=809</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/15/2007 7:10:50 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Florida Law Does Not Allow Interlocutory Appeal from Order Vacating Arbitration Award</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=791</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/14/2007 6:57:39 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NASD Arbitration Rules Do Not Allow Class Action Waivers</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=790</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/13/2007 7:13:10 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Florida Courts Remain Split on Who Decides Enforceability of Liability Limitations: Judge or Arbitrator?</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=788</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/9/2007 8:52:08 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Broad Arbitration Clause Empowers Arbitrator to Decide All Disputes, Including Enforceability of Exculpatory Clause</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=764</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/8/2007 7:28:10 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Decides Challenge to Underlying Contract Whenever FAA Governs Arbitration Clause</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=763</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/7/2007 6:55:37 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Exceeded Powers by Awarding Treble Damages When Claimant Only Sought Actual Damages</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=762</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>3/5/2007 9:36:45 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Core Bankruptcy Proceeding Disputes Are Arbitrable</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=744</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/27/2007 8:29:05 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator&#39;s Award Was Sufficiently Detailed to Satisfy the Parties&#39; Agreement That the Arbitrator Must Issue a &quot;Reasoned&quot; Award</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=742</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/23/2007 7:26:35 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Federal Court Honors Choice-of-Law Provision and Upholds Class Action Waiver</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=721</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/22/2007 9:11:24 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Non-Signatory to Arbitration Agreement Must Object to Jurisdiction Before Award Is Issued</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=723</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/22/2007 10:07:07 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrators Exceeded Their Powers by Awarding Fees in Contravention of the Parties&#39; Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=720</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/21/2007 6:54:58 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nonsignatories Under the Doctrine of Equitable Estoppel Enjoy FAA Right of Appeal</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=719</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/20/2007 7:14:45 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court Treats &quot;Infancy Doctrine&quot; As a Question for the Court to Determine Existence of Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=718</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/19/2007 7:14:54 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Eighth Circuit Upholds Arbitration Award over Public Policy Challenge</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=717</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/16/2007 8:52:51 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Agreement Continues in Effect After Expiration of Underlying Contract</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=701</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/15/2007 7:37:41 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fifth Circuit Holds That Arbitration Clause in Settlement Agreement Between Seaman and Employer Is Covered by FAA</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=698</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/15/2007 7:12:54 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Rejects Unconscionability Challenge to Nursing Home Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=708</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/15/2007 8:14:44 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Missouri Court: Motions to Compel Arbitration Will Not Be Granted Unless Served on Opposing Party Within a Reasonable Time</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=706</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/15/2007 8:06:52 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Challenge to Arbitration Award Must Be Timely</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=705</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/15/2007 8:00:39 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Orders Arbitration of Derivative Action Pursuant to Shareholders&#39; Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=695</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/12/2007 7:08:36 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court in Colorado Upholds Bar on Class-Wide Proceedings</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=694</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/9/2007 7:41:11 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mississippi Supreme Court Upholds Agreement to Arbitrate Questions of Arbitrability</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=693</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/8/2007 7:11:43 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Party Can Seek an Order Compelling Arbitration When Opposing Party Refuses to Arbitrate in Designated Locale</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=681</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/6/2007 10:43:16 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Must Decide Whether a Party Has Waived Right to Arbitrate, Unless Alleged Waiver Is Based on Litigation Conduct</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=680</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/5/2007 9:57:19 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Seventh Circuit: FAA Does Not Require Court to Stay Entire Case When Only Some Issues Are Subject to Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=679</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/2/2007 9:04:20 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Texas Federal Court Overturns Arbitral Award Based on Parties&#39; Agreement for a Heightened Standard of Review</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=664</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>2/1/2007 7:10:18 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limited Right of Modification Makes Arbitration Agreement Fair and Enforceable</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=663</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/31/2007 8:37:12 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Challenge to Validity of the Contract As a Whole Must Go to the Arbitrator</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=662</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/30/2007 7:02:39 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Receipt of Medicaid Payments Triggers Application of Federal Arbitration Act to Employment Dispute</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=661</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/29/2007 9:56:25 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sixth Circuit Concludes Arbitrators Did Not Exceed Powers and Upholds Summary Arbitration Award</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=660</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/26/2007 7:10:40 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fifth Circuit Upholds Finality of Arbitration by Rejecting Nondisclosure of Trivial Relationships As a Basis for Vacatur</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=635</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/25/2007 6:59:53 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Individual Members of Group Health Plan Are Entitled to Arbitration Disclosures Required by California Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=634</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/24/2007 7:16:38 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Courts Are Split on Whether Opt-Out Provision with Delayed Consequences Ensures Enforceability of Class Action Waiver</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=631</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/19/2007 7:01:25 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Law Governing Attorney-Client Fee Disputes Preempts Binding Arbitration Under State Law, but May Not Under FAA</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=608</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/18/2007 8:04:26 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Under Texas Law, Unconscionability Challenge to Arbitration Agreement Requires Proof of Procedural and Substantive Unconscionability</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=607</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/17/2007 7:27:46 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Courts Lack Authority to Order Mediation in Some Cases</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=605</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/15/2007 7:30:32 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Workers&#39; Compensation Claim Falls Within Employee&#39;s Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=601</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/12/2007 7:02:30 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Oklahoma Supreme Court Diverges from Majority Rule in Holding That the FAA Did Not Apply to a Nursing Home&#39;s Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=583</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/11/2007 7:14:15 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Cannot Proceed to Trial While Question of Arbitrability Is Under Appeal</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=582</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/10/2007 7:24:48 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Texas Supreme Court Allows Nonsignatories to Claim Benefits of Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=581</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/9/2007 7:06:16 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Can Exceed Powers by Committing an Error of Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=577</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/5/2007 7:51:13 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Under California Law, Direct Expression of Binding Intent Is Necessary to Exempt Settlement Agreement from Mediation Confidentiality</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=564</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/4/2007 7:11:43 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mediated Settlement Terms Gave Party Enforceable Seven-Day Right of Revocation</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=563</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>1/3/2007 9:43:42 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fifth Circuit Reaffirms Pro-Arbitration Federal Policy and Upholds &quot;Expansive&quot; Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=541</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/21/2006 7:44:38 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Georgia Supreme Court Holds That Prior Arbitration Award Has Res Judicata Effect</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=540</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/20/2006 9:49:42 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Moves Forward Even Though Claimant Invoked Right Against Self-Incrimination</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=539</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/19/2006 9:48:04 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Inclusion of Person?s Name on Contract Did Not Alone Prove Assent to Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=538</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/18/2006 6:48:12 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ninth Circuit Splinters on Proper Application of Buckeye</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=537</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/15/2006 12:41:34 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Louisiana Court Rejects Manifest Disregard of the Law as a Basis for Challenging Arbitration Awards</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=530</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/14/2006 6:46:01 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Enforces Arbitration Agreement Absent Specific Evidence That Arbitration Costs Are Excessive and Deter Individual Claims</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=529</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/13/2006 7:46:31 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Frivolous Challenge to Arbitration Award Triggers Sanctions</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=527</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/11/2006 6:45:07 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>No Amore for Italian Film Distributor Who Waived the Protections of a California Statute Governing International Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=503</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/7/2006 6:59:16 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite Conflicting Procedures, Separate Arbitration Provisions Still Show Intent to Arbitrate</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=502</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/6/2006 7:00:49 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court Upholds Credit Card Arbitration Agreement Formed by Change of Terms and Subsequent Use</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=501</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/5/2006 7:22:56 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Courts Will Not Consider Allegations of Arbitrator Bias Until Award Is Issued</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=499</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>12/1/2006 7:13:44 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Upholds Arbitration Award Finding Employer Liable for Discrimination</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=498</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/30/2006 7:08:33 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Confidentiality Protections Apply to Hybrid Procedure Consisting of Arbitration and Mediation</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=485</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/28/2006 8:11:46 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Federal Court Stays Litigation While Ninth Circuit Decides Issue of Arbitral Class Waiver</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=484</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/27/2006 6:55:46 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lack of Evidence Is Fatal to Motion to Vacate an Arbitration Award</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=463</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/21/2006 7:02:34 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Exceeds His Powers by Committing Legal Error</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=462</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/20/2006 6:52:07 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Court Errs by Holding Hearing After, Not Before, Motion to Compel Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=456</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/16/2006 7:05:18 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nonsignatory Must Arbitrate if Receiving Direct Benefits From the Underlying Contract</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=451</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/15/2006 6:42:25 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Indiana Court Refuses to Follow FTC?s ?Unreasonable? Position on Arbitration of Warranty Claims</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=450</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/14/2006 7:07:48 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FAA Preempts Nebraska Law Requiring Conspicuous Notice of Arbitration Clause</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=449</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/13/2006 7:08:41 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Upholds Arbitration Agreement Formed by ?Clicking? Acceptance</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=437</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/8/2006 9:32:24 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Federal Court Upholds Arbitration Agreement Containing Class Action Waiver</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=436</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/7/2006 7:22:25 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Broad Arbitration Clause Covering Future Timber Disputes Remains in Force Years After Harvest</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=415</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>11/1/2006 7:00:01 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Individual Investor Recoups Losses at Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=413</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/30/2006 7:05:05 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Florida Supreme Court Affirms Arbitrator?s Authority to Decide Timeliness Defenses</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=412</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/27/2006 7:29:50 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Michigan Court Applies Rational Basis Test to Arbitrators? Award</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=397</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/26/2006 7:13:55 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrators Have Full Authority to Grant Summary Judgment</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=396</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/25/2006 6:53:46 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thoroughbred Arbitration Award Has Racehorse Owner Out of Joint</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=394</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/24/2006 7:16:19 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Agreement Does Not Support Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction for a Lawsuit By a Nonsignatory</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=393</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/23/2006 9:03:13 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Agreements in Loan Documents Need to Exhibit Mutual Obligations to Arbitrate Claims</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=381</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/19/2006 8:20:02 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Employee Prevails in Attempt to Submit Employment Dispute to Arbitration</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=371</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/18/2006 8:00:44 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court Strongly Endorses Use of Arbitration for Sarbanes-Oxley Employment Claims</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=370</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/17/2006 7:27:38 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tenth Circuit Holds That Continued Employment Constitutes Assent to Arbitration Agreement</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=369</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/16/2006 7:02:31 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Illinois Supreme Court Supports Class Arbitration Waivers Where Consumers Can Opt Out or Have Affordable Arbitral Remedy</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=368</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/13/2006 7:12:50 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Claims Related to Embezzlement at Law Firm Arbitrable Even With Questionable Litigation Carve Out</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=347</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/12/2006 8:05:37 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California?s Mediation Confidentiality Rule Does Not Bar Evidence of Oral Settlement Agreement Reached at Mediation</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=345</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/10/2006 7:53:39 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration of Fee Dispute and Res Judicata Bar Subsequent Malpractice Lawsuit by E Street Ex</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=344</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/9/2006 7:11:05 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Confidentiality Agreement Protects Statement Made at Mediation</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=319</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>10/3/2006 7:02:27 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Agreement Survives Buyer?s Attempt to Undo the Sales Transaction and Covers Non-Signatory Collection Agency</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=298</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/28/2006 7:18:25 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Award Bars Subsequent RICO Action Under Doctrine of Res Judicata</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=297</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/27/2006 7:19:52 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>First Circuit: There Is No Manifest Disregard Unless the Arbitrator Expressly Disregards the Applicable Substantive Law</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=296</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/26/2006 6:51:35 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Court May Modify Execution of Terms, but not Substance, of Foreign Arbitration Award</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=295</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/25/2006 7:22:23 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrator Exceeded Authority by Awarding More Than Amount Requested</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=286</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/20/2006 3:57:17 PM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fifth Circuit Holds That Arbitration Clause in Insurance Policy Applies Only to Disputes Involving the Insurer, and Not Between Insureds</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=288</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/21/2006 6:46:24 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tennessee Court Follows ?Vast Majority of State and Federal Courts? by Upholding Waiver of Class-Wide Proceedings</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=278</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/15/2006 8:27:09 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Federal Court Says National Arbitration Forum?s Arbitral Procedures Ensure the Selection of a Neutral Arbitrator</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=266</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/14/2006 7:34:45 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitrators With Specific Authority Can Issue Supplemental Awards, Says NJ Court</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=260</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/13/2006 7:27:01 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tenth Circuit: Federal Courts Have Authority to Order Arbitration Outside Their District</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=259</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/12/2006 6:50:35 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Party Does Not Waive Right to Arbitrate by Filing Lawsuit Unless There is Prejudice to the Opposing Party</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=243</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/6/2006 7:33:21 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In California, Parties Can Contract for Judicial Review of Arbitrator?s Misapplication of the Law By Using ?Magic Words?</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=242</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/5/2006 6:56:00 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Parties? Submissions Expand Arbitrator?s Authority</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=241</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>9/1/2006 8:05:48 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alabama Supreme Court Says Arbitration Rules Must Provide For Award of Punitive Damages</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=228</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/31/2006 9:02:40 AM</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Arbitration Provides Consumers a Full Range of Legal Remedies</title>
<link>http://www.adrforum.com/adr_CaseDetails.aspx?caseid=212</link>
<description></description>
<pubDate>8/28/2006 7:14:49 AM</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
