URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
JCDECAUX SA v. Song Guang Yu et al.
Claim Number: FA1712001763667
DOMAIN NAME
<jcdecaux.ink>
<jcdecaux.link>
<jcdecaux.site>
<jcdecaux.tech>
<jcdecaux.work>
<jcdecaux.在线>
<德高.top>
PARTIES
Complainant: JCDECAUX SA of Plaisir, France | |
Complainant Representative: Nameshield
Laurent Becker of Angers, France
|
Respondent: Song Guang Yu Song Guang Yu of Bei Jing Shi, II, CN | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: Top Level Design, LLC,Uniregistry, Corp.,DotSite Inc.,Personals TLD Inc.,Minds + Machines Group Limited,TLD REGISTRY LIMITED,.TOP Registry | |
Registrars: Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina (www.net.cn) |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Mr. Sebastian Matthew White Hughes, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: December 20, 2017 | |
Commencement: December 20, 2017 | |
Default Date: January 8, 2018 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Findings of Fact: [OptionalComment] |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Complainant relies upon its international registration No. 803987 for the word mark JCDecaux, with a registration date of November 27, 2011 (the "Trade Mark"). The domain names jcdecaux.ink; jcdecaux.link; jcdecaux.site; jcdecaux.tech; jcdecaux.work and jcdecaux.在线 are all identical to the Trade Mark. Regrettably, the Complainant has not submitted proof of use of its Chinese language word mark 德高, registered in China under registration No. 4237801 and with a registration date of February 21, 2009. The Complainant has submitted proof of use of its (English language) Trade Mark only. The Examiner is therefore unable to make a determination in respect of the domain name 德高.top. [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Respondent has failed to demonstrate any rights or legitimate interests in each of the domain names jcdecaux.ink; jcdecaux.link; jcdecaux.site; jcdecaux.tech; jcdecaux.work and jcdecaux.在线. None of these domain names has been used. The Examiner is unable to make a determination in respect of the domain name 德高.top, as proof of use has not been filed by Complainant.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Each of the domain names jcdecaux.ink; jcdecaux.link; jcdecaux.site; jcdecaux.tech; jcdecaux.work and jcdecaux.在线 is identical to Complainant's Trade Mark. Each of these domain names has not been used. In all the circumstances the Examiner finds it is inconceivable Respondent was not aware of Complainant and of Complainant's Trade Mark rights when Respondent registered the above listed domain names. The Examiner is unable to make a determination in respect of the domain name 德高.top, as proof of use has not been filed by Complainant. The Examiner therefore dismisses the application with respect to the domain name 德高.top, without making any findings, and without prejudice to Complainant's right to re-file a URS or UDRP proceeding with the requisite proof of use. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the following
domain names should be dismissed without any findings; the Examiner hereby Orders
the following domain name(s) be returned to the control of the Respondent.
|
Mr. Sebastian Matthew White Hughes Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page