Thomson Reuters Global Resources Unlimited Company v. Alexander Fanthome
Claim Number: FA1806001794743
Complainant is Thomson Reuters Global Resources Unlimited Company (“Complainant”), represented by Thomas A. Walsh of MontaguLaw, P.C., USA. Respondent is Alexander Fanthome (“Respondent”), United Kingdom.
REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME
The domain name at issue is <reuters-financial.com>, registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Panelist in this proceeding.
Sandra J. Franklin as Panelist.
Complainant submitted a Complaint to the Forum electronically on June 29, 2018; the Forum received payment on June 29, 2018.
On July 2, 2018, GoDaddy.com, LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the <reuters-financial.com> domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name. GoDaddy.com, LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the GoDaddy.com, LLC registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”).
On July 3, 2018, the Forum served the Complaint and all Annexes, including a Written Notice of the Complaint, setting a deadline of July 23, 2018 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, via e-mail to all entities and persons listed on Respondent’s registration as technical, administrative, and billing contacts, and to postmaster@reuters-financial.com. Also on July 3, 2018, the Written Notice of the Complaint, notifying Respondent of the e-mail addresses served and the deadline for a Response, was transmitted to Respondent via post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on Respondent’s registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts.
A timely Response was received and determined to be complete on July 20, 2018.
On July 23, 2018, pursuant to Complainant's request to have the dispute decided by a single-member Panel, the Forum appointed Sandra J. Franklin as Panelist.
Having reviewed the communications records, the Administrative Panel (the "Panel") finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility under Paragraph 2(a) of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") "to employ reasonably available means calculated to achieve actual notice to Respondent" through submission of Electronic and Written Notices, as defined in Rule 1 and Rule 2.
Complainant requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant.
A. Complainant
1. Respondent’s <reuters-financial.com> domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s REUTERS mark.
2. Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the <reuters-financial.com> domain name.
3. Respondent registered and uses the <reuters-financial.com> domain name in bad faith.
B. Respondent consents to the transfer of the <reuters-financial.com> domain name to Complainant.
Complainant holds a registration for its REUTERS mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) (Reg. No. 1,008,206, registered Apr. 1, 1975), used in connection with providing financial and business news, and related services.
Respondent registered the <reuters-financial.com> domain name on February 6, 2018, and does not make an active use of the domain name. Respondent consents to the transfer of the disputed domain name to Complainant.
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules instructs this Panel to "decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable."
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires that Complainant must prove each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be cancelled or transferred:
(1) the domain name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and
(2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
(3) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
Preliminary Issue: Consent to Transfer
Respondent consents to transfer the <reuters-financial.com> domain name to Complainant. However, after the initiation of this proceeding, GoDaddy.com, LLC placed a hold on Respondent’s account and therefore Respondent cannot transfer the disputed domain name while this proceeding is still pending. The Panel finds that, in a circumstance such as this, where Respondent has not made an active use of the disputed domain name and consents to the transfer of the disputed domain name to Complainant, the Panel will forego the traditional UDRP analysis and order an immediate transfer of the <reuters-financial.com> domain name. See Boehringer Ingelheim Int’l GmbH v. Modern Ltd. – Cayman Web Dev., FA 133625 (Forum Jan. 9, 2003) (transferring the domain name registration where the respondent stipulated to the transfer); see also Malev Hungarian Airlines, Ltd. v. Vertical Axis Inc., FA 212653 (Forum Jan. 13, 2004) (“In this case, the parties have both asked for the domain name to be transferred to the Complainant . . . Since the requests of the parties in this case are identical, the Panel has no scope to do anything other than to recognize the common request, and it has no mandate to make findings of fact or of compliance (or not) with the Policy.”); see also Disney Enters., Inc. v. Morales, FA 475191 (Forum June 24, 2005) (“[U]nder such circumstances, where Respondent has agreed to comply with Complainant’s request, the Panel felt it to be expedient and judicial to forego the traditional UDRP analysis and order the transfer of the domain names.”).
Complainant having established all three elements required under the ICANN Policy, and Respondent having consented to the transfer, the Panel concludes that relief shall be GRANTED.
Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <reuters-financial.com> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant.
Sandra J. Franklin, Panelist
Dated: July 24, 2018
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page