NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
URS DEFAULT DETERMINATION
Geoffrey, LLC v. Joseph Cillo
Claim Number: FA1412001595126
DOMAIN NAME
<toysrus.nyc>
PARTIES
Complainant: Geoffrey, LLC of Wayne, NJ, United States of America | |
Complainant Representative: Blank Rome LLP
Megan E Spitz of Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
|
Respondent: Joseph Cillo of bronx, NY, United States | |
REGISTRIES and REGISTRARS
Registries: The City of New York by and through the New York City Department of Information Technology & Telecommunications | |
Registrars: GoDaddy.com, Inc. |
EXAMINER
The undersigned certifies that he or she has acted independently and impartially and to the best of his or her knowledge has no known conflict in serving as Examiner in this proceeding. | |
Ahmet Akguloglu, as Examiner |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant Submitted: December 12, 2014 | |
Commencement: December 15, 2014 | |
Default Date: December 30, 2014 | |
Having reviewed the communications records, the Examiner finds that the National Arbitration Forum has discharged its responsibility under URS Procedure Paragraphs 3 and 4 and Rule 4 of the Rules for the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (the "Rules"). |
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant requests that the domain name be suspended for the life of the registration. |
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Clear and convincing evidence. |
FINDINGS and DISCUSSION
Procedural Findings: | ||
Multiple Complainants: The Complaint does not allege multiple Complainants. | ||
Multiple Respondents: The Complaint does not allege multiple Respondents. |
Findings of Fact: The Complainant claimed to be a subsidiary of Toys “R” Us Inc., headquartered in NYC suburb Wayne, NJ and a leading worldwide retailer of toys, games and numerous other consumer goods, with its flagship store located in NYC’s Time Square. The Complainant has also claimed that it is the exclusive owner of the "TOYSRUS" marks, which are used and registered in United States and throughout the world for such goods and services and which are amongst the most recognizable and valuable brands worldwide. The Complainant also asserted that it holds numerous valid national and regional registrations worldwide and that are currently in use. The complainant claimed that the respondent has no legitimate right or interest on the domain name and the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. Respondent provided no response to the complaint. |
Even though the Respondent has defaulted, URS Procedure 1.2.6, requires Complainant to make a prima facie case, proven by clear and convincing evidence, for each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended.
[URS 1.2.6.1] The registered domain name(s) is/are identical or confusingly similar
to a word mark: Determined: Finding for Complainant It is clear that the Complainant has met its burden by clear and convincing evidence that the domain name is identical to the word mark “TOYSRUS” for which the Complainant holds valid national and regional registrations and that are in current use. [URS 1.2.6.2] Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name. Determined: Finding for Complainant The Complainant did not authorize the Respondent for use of the “TOYSRUS” trademark. The Respondent did not submit any response or evidence to the contrary that it has legitimate interest for usage of the “TOYSRUS” trademark. Therefore, it is understood that the Respondent does not have any right or legitimate interest over the disputed domain name.
[URS 1.2.6.3] The domain name(s) was/were registered and is being used in bad faith.
Determined: Finding for Complainant Given the well-known status of the Complainant’s trademark, the Respondent was clearly well aware of the Complainant and of its rights on the trademark when it registered the domain name. Besides, the Respondent has proceeded to register and use the domain name in order to attract intentional commercial gain from internet users by way of parking the page in order to gain pay-per-click revenue. Moreover, as far as understood from the who.is records, the Respondent registered several well-known brands as a domain name, namely; <bacardi.nyc>, <barnesandnoble.nyc>, <budlight.nyc>, <drpepper.nyc>, <freddiemac.nyc>, <generalmotors.nyc>, <hrblock.nyc>, <kraft.nyc>, <radioshack.nyc> and <waltdisney.nyc>. Accordingly, the Examiner finds that the Respondent registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith. FINDING OF ABUSE or MATERIAL FALSEHOOD The Examiner may find that the Complaint was brought in an abuse of this proceeding or that it contained material falsehoods. The Examiner finds as follows:
DETERMINATION
After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Examiner determines that the Complainant
has demonstrated all three elements of the URS by a standard of clear and convincing
evidence; the Examiner hereby Orders the following domain name(s) be SUSPENDED for
the duration of the registration:
|
Ahmet Akguloglu Examiner
Click Here to return to the main Domain Decisions Page.
Click Here to return to our Home Page